Comparison of Productivity and Efficiency of Irrigation Water Consumption in Lands With Traditional Network under Mirab Management and Integrated and Renovated Lands

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 میدان بسیج-پردیس کشاورزی گروه مهندسی آب

2 Associated professor

3 gorgan

Abstract
Traditional water distribution with Mirab is effective to a certain extent in the fair distribution of water, but it has limitations in terms of efficiency and productivity. While in modern networks, it is possible to try to optimize the allocation and distribution of water by using advanced technology and infrastructure. Of course, the implementation of a modern irrigation network, despite the high cost of its implementation, does not necessarily mean that it will be successful in the assigned operation, and its performance should be evaluated and analyzed by experts in this matter. water consumption efficiency in two villages of Shahkooh Sofla with traditional irrigation network and Mohammad Abad with renovated irrigation network and integrated lands has been done. The required data in this section included a questionnaire and field measurements of water flow in the network, and finally with the help of these data, the water productivity in the fields was calculated. performance per water volume unit (CPD), and economic productivity indicators, including gross profit per water volume unit (BPD) and net profit per water volume unit (NBPD) were calculated average CPD index in terms of fresh weight, BPD and NPBD in the Shahkooh, 7.54 (kilogram of wet matter per cubic meter), 12425, 10427 (tomans per cubic meter) and in the Mohammad Abad, respectively 0.41 (kilogram of dry matter per cubic meter), 1510 , 918 (tomans per cubic meter) has been obtained. Therefore, in Shahkooh , despite the traditional network of water distribution management, more economic productivity has been achieved

Keywords


  1. Rahimzadeh, A., and Rostami, R. (2015). Assessing Water Distribution Efficiency and Crop Yield in a Traditional Irrigation System. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 8(4), 536-541.
  2. Mohammadi, H., Karami, A., and Ghahraman, B. (2018). A Comparative Study of Water Productivity in Traditional and Modern Irrigation Systems. Water Resources Management, 32(3), 1191-1204.
  3. Khaledian, M. R., Arshad, M., Ghoreishi, M. S., and Mousavi, S. F. (2017). Water Use Efficiency in Traditional and Modernized Irrigation Systems: A Case Study in Iran. Water, 9(10), 809.
  4. Saatsaz, M. (2020). A historical investigation on water resources management in Iran. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22, 1749-1785.
  5. Goes, B. J. M., Howarth, S. E., Wardlaw, R. B., Hancock, I. R., and Parajuli, U. N. (2016). Integrated water resources management in an insecure river basin: a case study of Helmand River Basin, Afghanistan. International Journal of water resources Development, 32(1), 3-25.
  6. Mengistu, K. T. (2009). Watershed hydrological responses to changes in land use and land cover, and management practices at Hare Watershed, Ethiopia.
  7. Hussainzada, W., Cabrera, J. S., Samim, A. T., and Lee, H. S. (2023). Water resource management for improved crop cultivation and productivity with hydraulic engineering solution in arid northern Afghanistan. Applied Water Science, 13(2), 41.
  8. Hanjra, M. A., Ferede, T., and Gutta, D. G. (2009). Pathways to breaking the poverty trap in Ethiopia: Investments in agricultural water, education, and markets. Agricultural Water Management, 96(11), 1596-1604.
  9. Amejo, A. G., Gebere, Y. M., Kassa, H., and Tana, T. (2018). Agricultural productivity, land use and draught animal power formula derived from mixed crop-livestock systems in Southwestern Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(42), 2362-2381.