Estimation of soil water characteristic curve parameters in different models in light soils

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 sfahan university

2 Department of Water Science and Engineering, College of Agriculture Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract
In addition to soil water content, soil matric potential is also important for plant growth. Soil water characteristic curve (SWCC) or soil moisture characteristic curve describes soil water content and soil matric potential relationship. Many models have been developed to describe the SWCCs and their fitting to the experimental data. However, their fitting accuracies in different soil textures, have been rarely investigated. In this study, matric potential-moisture data of 16 soil sample of forest station in Finland use to fit SWCC models. Nine well known and frequently applied SWCC models were fitted to the measured data. The most accurate models of total soil samples, each textural group and each textural class were estimated using root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R2) and mean error (ME). Result showed that van Genuchten-Mualem, van Genuchten, Gardner and Brutsaert models had most accurate and Brooks and Corey model had least accurate to predict SWCC.

Keywords


Bagheri H., Shahidi A. 2021. Evaluation of different methods of simulating the soil moisture curve. The 5th National Congress of Irrigation and Drainage of Iran. Birjand, Iran. (In Persion)
Bayat H., Ebrahimi E., Rastgo M., Zare Abyaneh H., Davatgar N.  2013. Fitting different soil water characteristic Curve mdels on the experimental data of various textural classes of Guilan Province Soils. Water and Soil Science, 23(3), pp. 151-167. (In Persion)
Bayram M., Heidari F., Saghaei S. 2016. Assessing the soil water characteristic curve (SWCC) models. Journal of Environment and Water Engineering. 1(1), pp. 30-50. (In Persion)
Buchan GD., Grewal KS., Robson AB. 1993. Improved models of particle-size distribution: An illustration of model comparison techniques. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 57(4), pp. 901-908.
Brooks R., A. Corey. 1964. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
Campbell GS. 1974. A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention data. Soil Science.117(6), pp. 311-314.
Durner W. 1994. Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resource Research. 30(2), pp. 211–223.
Fooladmand H.R., Hadipour S. 2012. Evaluation of parametric pedotransfer functions for estimating soil water characteristic curve in Fars Province. Journal of Water and Soil Science, 15 (58), pp.25-37. (In Persion)
Gardner W. 1956. Mathematics of isothermal water conduction in unsaturated soils. International Symposuim on Physico Chemical Phenomenon in Soils. Washington DC.
Groenevelt PH., Grant CD. 2004. A new model for the soil water retention curve that solves the problem of residual water contents. European Journal of Soil Science. 55(3), pp. 479-485.
Gimenz D., Rawls WJ., Pachepsky Y., Watt JPC. 2001. Prediction of a pore distribution factor from soil textural and mechanical parameters. Soil Science. 166(2), pp. 79-88.
Gupta S.C., Larson W.E. 1979. Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter percent and bulk density. Water Resource Research. 15(6), pp. 1633-1635.
Haghshenas M., Beigi Harcheghani H. 2010. The effect of Mianeh zeolite on water retention and water retention models in two soil textures. Iranian Water Research Journal, 4(1), pp. 35-42. (In Persion)
Hodentt MG., Tomasella J. 2002. Water retention parameters for temperate and tropical soils: a new water retention pedotransfer functions developed for tropical soils. Geoderma. 108(3-4), pp. 155-180.
Jauhiainen M. 2004. Relationships of particle size distribution curve, Soil water retention curve and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and their implications on water balance of forested and agricultural hillslopes, Ph.D Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki/Finland.
Kozak E. Pachepsky Y. A., Sokolowski S., Sokolowska Z., Stepniewski W. 1996. A modified number-based method for estimating fragmentation fractal dimensions of soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 60(5), pp. 1291–1297.
McKee C., Bumb A. 1984. The importance of unsaturated low parameters in designing a hazardous waste site. 50-58.
McKee C., Bumb A. 1987. Flow-testing coalbed methane production wells in the presence of water and gas. SPE Formation Evaluation. 2(04), pp. 599-608.
Patil NG., Pal DK., Mandal C., Mandal DK. 2012. Soil water retention characteristics of vertosols and pedotransfer functions based on nearest neighbor and neural network approach to estimate AWC. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 138(2), pp.1-10.
Ross PJ., Williams J., Bristow KL.1991. Equations for extending water retention curves to dryness. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 55(4), pp. 923-927.
Sillers WS., Fredlund DG., Zakerzadeh, N. 2001. Mathematical attributes of some soil water characteristic curve models. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 19: 243-283
Seki K. 2007. SWRC fit - a nonlinear fitting program with a water retention curve for soils having unimodal and bimodal pore structure. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions. 4(1), pp. 407–437.
Tani M. 1982. The properties of a water-table rise produced by a one-dimensional, vertical, unsaturated flow (in Japanese with an English summary). Journal of Japan for Society. 64(11), pp. 409-418.
van Genuchten MTh. 1980. A closed form equation predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 44(5), pp. 892-898.
Vereecken H., Maes J., Feyen J., Darius P. 1989. Estimating the soil moisture retention characteristics from texture bulk density and carbon content. Soil Science. 148(6), pp. 389-403.
Zare Abyaneh H., Mahdavi Moghadam N., Bagheri H. 2018. Soil moisture estimation by determining of van Genuchten retention-curve coefficients in drip irrigation. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage. 6(11), p. 1121-1129. (In Persion)