Investigation the role of socio-economic issues in the development of the desert Watersheds (Case study: Yazdanabad watershed, Kerman Province (

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research, Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Kerman, Iran.

2 1Assistant Professor, Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research, Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Kerman, Iran. Hamzah.4900@yahoo.com

3 3- Researcher, Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research, Kerman Agricultural and Natural Resource Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Kerman, Iran.

Abstract
Socio-economic issues in watersheds around the world have become one of the most important issues in watersheds. In this research, first the sub-basins of Yazdanabad watershed were identified and then the socio-economic issues of Yazdanabad watershed were investigated and the gross revenues of the studied watershed and expenses and the net profits production of the watershed were determined. Consequently, the gross revenues of the watershed productions, as well as costs and net profit of the watershed productions were determined. Then, net revenue of production and household resources in Yazdanabad watershed was obtained in the Conventional Zone and the method and mechanism of practical solutions were proposed to solve the problems of Yazdanabad watershed. Considering that the existing agricultural exploitation systems are traditional in the studied area, it will lead to a series of problems that cause erosion, water shortage, income shortage and migration in the watershed.According to the economic studies done on the sources of production and income and according to the results the cost-benefit ratio of different sources of production in Yazdanabad watershed is 0.55 which is a low figure. Practical solutions for solving the problems of Yazdanabad watershed include establishment of watershed cooperatives, holding training classes, construction of semi-industrial livestock, construction of livestock health house, construction of tourism infrastructure and programs for cultivation and operation of medicinal plants are suggested. The results showed that in Yazdanabad watershed, the most common systems are related to the rural-nomadsand the lowest type of common systems is related to rural.

Keywords


Amirnejad, H. & H. Rafiee. 2010. A study on the effect of Socio-economic factors on User’s participation in range management projects. Journal of Rangeland, 3(4): 710-722.
Bagherian, R., J. Rezaee, E. Broshke, A. Bagherian Kalat, A. Jafari & H. Raahimi. 2014. Evaluation of socio-economic impacts of flood water spreading projects among neighboring villages. Extension and Development of Watershed Management, 3(9): 39-26.
Barani, H. 2005. Strengthen and enrich the glossary of scientific and technical knowledge using traditional technology. Journal of Social Sciences, (34):13-40.
Bhattacharya, A. 2008. Sustainable livelihood based watershed management–Watershed plus approach. In 2nd Working Group meeting of ERIA, Japan IGES, pp: 2-6.
Constantino, P.A.L., H.S.A. Carlos, E.E. Ramalho, L. Rostant, C. Marinelli, D. Teles, S.F. FonsecaJunior, R.B. Fernandes & J. Valsecchi. 2012. Empowering local people through community-based resource monitoring: a comparison between Brazil and Namibia. Ecology and Society, 17(4):22.
Elyasi, A., K. Shahedi & Sh. Rastgar. 2018. Effective Factors on Stakeholders’ Willingness to Participate at Watershed Management Projects in Hezarkhani Watershed. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 8(16): 259-270.
Fattahi, M., N. Ansari, H. Abasi, M. Hasani, 2000. Management of Zagros forests (Case Study: forests of Darbadam in Kermanshah province). Published by Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 472 p.
FooladiZadeh M. & M. BeigiParvaneh. 2016. Improving local community participation and empowerment, a step towards developing natural resources. Selected works and articles of the tenth Congress of Pioneers of Progress. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences, Gorgan, Iran, 582-588.
Fouladi Halileh, B., Khosravipour, B. 2016. Explaining the Model of Resistance Economy in Iranian Agriculture, National Conference on Passive Defense in Agriculture, Agricultural and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan.
Hosseinzadeh, A., Heydari, A., Barani, H., Zali, H., Zandi, Isfahan, A. 2015. Evaluation of social and economic effects on the social cohesion of nomads (Case study: Nomads of the Shahsavan tribe in the slopes of Mount Sablan), Range and Watershed Journal, 69(4): 851-861. (In Persian)
Imani Rastabi, M., Jalilvand, H., Zand Basiri, M. 2013. Investigating the social-economic issues of the customary forests of Klagchi Zagros in Chahar Mahal and Bakhtiari, Journal of Natural Ecosystems of Iran, 4(2): 59-70. (In Persian)
Jafari Mehdiabad, F., Abdulahi Ezzatabadi, M. 2017. Investigating some economic and social issues of the phenomenon of land subsidence caused by excessive exploitation of underground water in Rafsanjan city, Geography and Urban Planning, 26: 245-262. (In Persian)
Kolahi, M., K. Moriya, T. Sakai, E. Khosrojerdi & V. Etemad. 2014. Introduction of participatory conservation in Iran: case study of the rural communities’ perspectives in Khojir National Park. International Journal of Environmental Research, 8(4): 913-930.
Kolahi, M., T. Sakai, K. Moriya & M. Aminpour. 2013. Ecotourism Potentials for Financing Parks and Protected Areas: A Perspective from Iran's Parks. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 9(1): 144-152.
Mansourian, N. & B. Mohammadi Golrang. 2007. Economic and social study of watershed management plans in Iran (Case study of Kame Watershed of Khorasan Razavi Province). 6th Iranian Agricultural Economics Conference. Agricultural Economics Association, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran, 15 pp.
Mohammadi, S., S.H. Tayebnia & A. Davoodi. 2017. On the Effects' Evaluation and Analysis of the Implementation Rural Guiding Plans to Improve the Quality of Villagers Life (Case Study: Khavmirabad Villages of Marivan District). Journal of Studies of Human Settlements Planning, 12(2): 391 – 411.
Saeedi, A. 1998. Sustainable Development and Instability of Rural Development, Quarterly of the Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation, Second Year, No. 34.
Vinov, A., Arctur, D. Zaslavskiy, I. 2008. Community-based software tools to support participatory modeling: q vision. International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software. IEMSs. 766-774 PP.
Webb, N.P., C.J. Stokes, N.A. Marshall, 2013. Integrating biophysical and socio-economic evaluations to improve the efficacy of adaptation assessments for agriculture.
Yakhkeshi, A. 2007. Integrated management in the North Caspian forests with community participation. Publisher by mirmah, 48 Pp.